[{"innerBlocks":[],"name":"core\/freeform","postId":1614,"blockType":{"name":"core\/freeform","keywords":[],"attributes":{"content":{"type":"string","source":"raw"},"lock":{"type":"object"}},"providesContext":[],"usesContext":[],"selectors":[],"supports":{"className":false,"customClassName":false,"reusable":false},"styles":[],"variations":[],"apiVersion":3,"title":"Classic","description":"Use the classic WordPress editor.","category":"text"},"originalContent":"The American Medical Informatics Association is urging the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT to develop deeper electronic health record reporting requirements than those mandated by the 21st Century Cures Act.

Signed into law in December 2016, the Cures Act calls for a transparent process to develop criteria as part of an \u201cEHR Reporting Program\u201d for certified health IT. The reporting program was meant as a way to engage stakeholders and gather information about EHR usability, interoperability, and security to help providers better choose EHR products.

However, AMIA believes the EHR reporting program should bring transparency to how certified EHRs perform in production environments with live patient data, the association noted in a comment letter to regulators.

\"ONC should develop an EHR reporting program that more closely approximates a post-implementation surveillance ecosystem, not a government-sponsored \u2018consumer reports,\u2019\u201d according to AMIA. \u201cSuch an ecosystem would illuminate certified EHR performance used in production and would generate product performance data automatically without users having to submit reporting criteria.\u201d

Also See:<\/b> Pew, AMIA say budget cut could thwart ONC\u2019s Cures Act goals<\/a>

Specifically, the association points to ONC\u2019s existing surveillance and oversight program for certified EHRs\u2014that is just coming into existence\u2014that AMIA contends could be leveraged for the EHR reporting program.

In addition, the group suggests that ONC look at the Food and Drug Administration\u2019s Digital Health Software Precertification Program as an example of a federal program that seeks to use real-world production data.

\u201cThis concept of real-world production data is a reality in most, if not all, certified electronic health records,\u201d states AMIA\u2019s letter to ONC. \u201cFor example, one well-known developer has the capacity to report how frequently a summary of care record failed to send for an ordered care transition. In this example, users can see if the failure occurred in the ordering workflow, if the failure occurred in transit, and whether the transaction was received and acknowledged by the recipient system.\u201d

Another example offered by AMIA is how EHR developers calculate Provider Efficiency Profiles, which provide clinician-level data about workload, system usage, specific number of tools adapted, amount of time in certain activities, as well as time spent during specific hours of the day.

The complete AMIA comment letter to ONC is available here<\/a>.","saveContent":"The American Medical Informatics Association is urging the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT to develop deeper electronic health record reporting requirements than those mandated by the 21st Century Cures Act.

Signed into law in December 2016, the Cures Act calls for a transparent process to develop criteria as part of an \u201cEHR Reporting Program\u201d for certified health IT. The reporting program was meant as a way to engage stakeholders and gather information about EHR usability, interoperability, and security to help providers better choose EHR products.

However, AMIA believes the EHR reporting program should bring transparency to how certified EHRs perform in production environments with live patient data, the association noted in a comment letter to regulators.

\"ONC should develop an EHR reporting program that more closely approximates a post-implementation surveillance ecosystem, not a government-sponsored \u2018consumer reports,\u2019\u201d according to AMIA. \u201cSuch an ecosystem would illuminate certified EHR performance used in production and would generate product performance data automatically without users having to submit reporting criteria.\u201d

Also See:<\/b> Pew, AMIA say budget cut could thwart ONC\u2019s Cures Act goals<\/a>

Specifically, the association points to ONC\u2019s existing surveillance and oversight program for certified EHRs\u2014that is just coming into existence\u2014that AMIA contends could be leveraged for the EHR reporting program.

In addition, the group suggests that ONC look at the Food and Drug Administration\u2019s Digital Health Software Precertification Program as an example of a federal program that seeks to use real-world production data.

\u201cThis concept of real-world production data is a reality in most, if not all, certified electronic health records,\u201d states AMIA\u2019s letter to ONC. \u201cFor example, one well-known developer has the capacity to report how frequently a summary of care record failed to send for an ordered care transition. In this example, users can see if the failure occurred in the ordering workflow, if the failure occurred in transit, and whether the transaction was received and acknowledged by the recipient system.\u201d

Another example offered by AMIA is how EHR developers calculate Provider Efficiency Profiles, which provide clinician-level data about workload, system usage, specific number of tools adapted, amount of time in certain activities, as well as time spent during specific hours of the day.

The complete AMIA comment letter to ONC is available here<\/a>.","order":0,"get_parent":{},"attributes":[],"attributesType":{"content":{"type":"string","source":"raw"},"lock":{"type":"object"}},"dynamicContent":""}]

AMIA asks ONC to focus on deeper EHR reporting criteria

More for you